QuantumThink-Wave, Time for A New Science

~Dianne Collins

Excerpt from Page 286, Do You QuantumThink? New Thinking That Will Rock Your World

If “there is no matter as such” as father of quantum mechanics Max Planck declared, then what does physics actually study? The behavior of things, not the things themselves. Who has investigated the science of consciousness? Not “consciousness studies” but the scientific discipline that explores the nature of consciousness and what it is capable of—just as we study biology or chemistry.

People ask, (at least scientists do), what is matter? What is it made of? How did it begin? How did it get here? How did it get to end up in the state it is in? People ask, (at least some people do, and more scientists should be asking), what is consciousness?

Consider that these may not be “Being In The Right Question” in the sense that, if there is no “is” or way that something “is”—if it’s all a moving mosaic of endless possibilities that we guide and refine, narrow into probabilities, and eventually manifest into actualities, then we can ask different kinds of  questions.

We experience life through what we call consciousness or mind, including the mind we experience through the heart or feeling. Now we might ask, what is consciousness capable of? How can we best use or work with consciousness? These questions which acknowledge the dynamic quality of consciousness/mind will lead us in much different directions than attempting to define what seems to be essentially indefinable. “Consciousness” is not a fixed “thing.” The conscious generating of Intent defies a fixed state. Still, we can work with it. We can delve further into its dynamics.

If consciousness is fundamental to all the Multidimensions of reality, then who is studying it? If the current scientific method is directed and designed for the study of the physical-material dimension of reality only, then perhaps we need a new branch of science. If our current instrumentation and scientific protocols are not able to study the nature of consciousness, then maybe we need a new method of measurement.

Most astute scientists would concur (as non-scientists do also) with Einstein’s statement that we cannot solve our current problems with the same level of thinking that created the current problems. Then it follows strictly as a matter of ordinary logic: we cannot explore consciousness—which is nonmaterial—with a scientific method developed specifically for studying the material aspect of reality. Perhaps it’s time for a new science and a new method … that would give us insight into how anything manifests. Until then, we can explore Resonance. ##. -Dianne Collins